| |
If you would like your name to be
deleted from our e-mail list, or if you would prefer a hard copy of this
newsletter, or if you would like us to add a name to our distribution list,
please e-mail your request to
project@biodiverse.org .
From the Director:
Striving for Perpetual Bounty
New Biodiversity Project
Publication: Ethics for a Small
Planet
Why Should We Talk About Ethics,
Values, and Biodiversity?
Giving Thanks for Nature's Bounty:
Biodiversity-the Thanksgiving Table
Biodiversity and Smart Growth Ads- CD
Rom Available
Cease-fire at Pinkham Notch:
Defusing the Wise-Use Movement
From the Director: Striving for Perpetual Bounty
 |
The Thanksgiving
season is a time when we can all reflect upon the remarkable bounty
that the Earth brings to our lives. In this issue, Tami Lee
provides a look at four species that anchor the traditional American
Thanksgiving dinner, and their pathway from the wild to our tables.
If not for space constraints, we could have added dozens, if not
hundreds of other species that contribute to this feast, whether it
is sage in the stuffing, the nutmeg in the pie, or the pollinators
that make the |
|
cran-blossoms
turn into cranberries. In my own family, I hold a place of honor
for the cardamom seeds that flavored Grandma Johnson’s special
bread. (I’ve often wondered how an Indian spice became a staple in
Swedish bread making, but I’m grateful that it did.)
Beyond the
species on the menu, we owe an extended debt of gratitude to the
diverse ecosystems that made this variety possible. So, here’s to
the American bogs that are home to cranberries, the woodlands that
support wild turkeys, the high country of the Andes for the
possibility of mashed potatoes, the warm climates of the Americas
from which the sweet potato flourished, and much of the Americas for
the pumpkin. Also, thanks to the hands and knowledge of many human
cultures that make our feast what it is today. Thanksgiving is a
true celebration of diversity and the web of connections that
support and enrich human life.
While we
celebrate this bounty, we also need to be mindful of our
responsibility to sustain it. At the recent Waters of Wisconsin
conference I was part of a small group discussion on the concept of
sustainability. When asked to define sustainability, the phrase
“perpetual bounty” formed in my thought. Sustainable means now, but
it also means the future, and it doesn’t mean scarcity, it means we
will always have what we need to live, and to live well.
Conflicting
definitions of “living well” may be at the root of a lot of today’s
ecological crises. We live on a planet where humans are mining the
‘ecological capital’ that is at the heart of our global life support
systems. Americans consume more material goods, more water, and
more oil per person than any other nation on the planet. At the
same time, many of the world’s people do not have secure access to
safe drinking water, and millions go hungry every day. And also
every day, we are losing habitat to pavement and deforestation, and
the rapid rates of extinction are largely unabated. Clearly, not
everyone is enjoying the bounty so many of us take for granted, and
the environmental costs of current actions are huge. If my bounty
translates into someone else’s deprivation or extinction, then we
have a long way to go before we reach sustainability.
And this is where
ethics come in. Solutions to the biodiversity crisis are rooted in
ethical choices: how do we choose to live with each other and the
Earth’s living systems? A solid majority of Americans firmly
believe that we have a personal – some say moral – responsibility to
protect the life that sustains us. Sow how do we help people act on
that conviction? We need to help people understand what is at
stake, the choices we face, and ways to act ethically for humanity,
for life, and for the future.
As a first step,
we’ve published Ethics for A Small Planet: A Communications Handbook
on the Ethical and Theological Reasons for Protecting Biodiversity.
We hope it will spark a conversation about protecting biodiversity
through the lens of ethics – our sense of right and wrong. In my
heart, and in yours, we know that protecting this miraculous
diversity of life is the right thing to do. We also know that we
can choose to live in ways and to promote choices that help sustain
biodiversity. This handbook will help us talk about it in ways that
reach beyond our choir of like-minded friends - and that’s another
thing to be grateful for. |

Jane Elder |
|
Back to Top
New
Biodiversity Project Publication:
Ethics for a Small Planet
The Biodiversity Project is pleased to announce the publication of its
new book,
Ethics for a Small Planet: A Communications Handbook on the Ethical and
Theological Reasons for Protecting Biodiversity. |
|
 |
This handbook is meant to be a tool to
help biodiversity spokespersons—activists, scientists, educators, and
anyone else who loves the living planet—open a broader conversation with
the public on the ethical issues related to protecting species, habitat,
ecosystems, and all the interconnections that make our planet
life-giving, wondrous, and beautiful. Our goals in creating this
handbook are to help biodiversity advocates: |
|
▪
Understand the origins of contemporary views on
biodiversity conservation;
▪ Integrate ethical messages into their outreach; and
▪ Feel confident and credible doing so. |
|
Featuring essays from a distinguished group of ethicists, theologians,
environmental advocates and communications experts, Ethics for a Small
Planet is an invitation to explore and test the waters of public
dialogue about what is right and wrong for protecting biodiversity.
Take a look at some excerpts of Ethics
for a Small Planet in the following pages of this newsletter. We hope
this new book helps you become a more effective voice for biodiversity,
encourages you to express the ethical principles that motivate you to
protect and care for life on Earth and enables you to reach more people
about the “why” of saving biodiversity, as well as the “what.” |
| |
Reserve Your Copy for
Ethics for a Small Planet Today!
Are you interested in the connection
between our ethical and religious traditions and saving biodiversity?
Do you want to learn how to integrate ethical- and spiritually-based
messages into your outreach?
Do you want to help Americans see that saving biodiversity is consistent
with their values and is the right thing to do?
Ethics for a Small Planet is a
communications handbook that is designed to make your public education
more effective by helping you make the link between biodiversity
conservation and the major ethical and religious traditions that have
shaped the values and attitudes of most Americans.
The book includes background essays
written by leading ethicists and theologians, communications tips from
the Biodiversity Project, and a cornucopia of polling data, case studies
and other resources that can help you enrich your communications by
using effective values-based messages.
The cost of Ethics for a Small Planet is
$30 per copy (bulk discounts available).
For information on ordering and to reserve
a copy, contact the Biodiversity Project at
project@biodiverse.org
(please include the subject line: Ethics book in your message), or call
(608) 250-9876. |
back to top
Why Should We Talk About Ethics, Values, and
Biodiversity?
by Jane Elder
(excerpted from Ethics for a Small Planet)
Why step into the murky
world of values, ethics, moral perspectives, and theological viewpoints?
Why not stick to the facts, the purely rational? Why? Because humans are
complex beings, and we make decisions about what to do, about what is right
and wrong, through a mix of thought and feeling, rational argument and
intuition, head and heart, data and gut instinct.
Whenever environmental problems are debated,
there is almost always someone who encourages environmental advocates to set
aside personal feeling and focus on the facts. Facts are useful, but they
aren’t the whole of the matter. All the data in the world won’t persuade
you to do something if some inner voice is screaming, “That’s wrong!”
Underlying that inner voice—the one that tells you, “this is right, this is
important, trust this, but not that,” your sense of right and wrong—is a
tapestry of ethical history, cultural norms, and personal values. Ethics
for a Small Planet is about exploring that tapestry and better understanding
what makes people (Americans in particular), come to conclusions about what
they value in relation to biodiversity, how those values shape decisions
about biodiversity, and how we can better address those values and weave
ethics into our outreach.
Four Reasons to Talk
About Ethics.
Here are four reasons why understanding and
addressing the moral and spiritual basis of biodiversity protection can make
us more effective in expanding the dialogue about biodiversity and fostering
solutions to current problems.
1. Most lasting social
change is anchored in a deep moral imperative.
Throughout human history, human
society has demonstrated its capacity for positive change, whether it is
rejecting slavery, increasing global awareness of basic human rights, or
enacting child labor laws. While social change is played out on a
complex stage of economic, |
 |
| social, and
political dynamics, at the heart of progress in human culture is a
driving force that the change is the right thing to do—the moral
imperative. Increasingly, leading thinkers in the field of
biodiversity—from E.O. Wilson to Jane Goodall to David Suzuki—have given
voice to the moral dimensions of the biodiversity crisis. Biodiversity
advocates must expand the dialogue to explore and claim the moral
imperative to protect Earth’s life support systems. What larger moral
question have we faced, if not the future of our species and the rest of
life on Earth? If we fail to tackle the moral and ethical aspects of
the biodiversity crisis, the “Sixth Great Extinction” (the current and
largest loss of species in human history) will remain primarily the
concern of science and academia. People will view it as a problem for
experts to solve, not all of us. |
2. Values-based rationales for protecting biodiversity are widely held
and persuasive.
Protecting biodiversity is
important to people because they believe that they have a responsibility
to protect the Earth for future generations, and because they believe
that nature is God’s creation and that they should respect the work of
God. In the Biodiversity Project’s 2002 and 1996 polls, these two
reasons outranked all others in the survey.
In our 2002 poll, a majority of those
surveyed strongly agreed with one of these two statements in a split
sample question: “we have a moral responsibility to protect
biodiversity” (65%) or “we have a personal responsibility to protect
biodiversity” (69%).
Values are the lenses
through which we judge the information we receive. Factual
data—including scientific and economic statistics—are interpreted,
shaped, and evaluated through the prism of our values. Therefore,
values are as important, if not more so, than facts in getting a message
across.
|
 |
3.
Reframing the debate humanizes and personalizes choices about
biodiversity.
The more we can humanize biodiversity, and the less it remains in the
realm of numbers, science, |
|
and something that happens “out there in
nature,” the better chance we have of connecting with people of diverse
backgrounds and interests. Addressing the ethical dimensions of a
biodiversity debate—what’s right for my family and the generations that
follow us?—changes the conversation. |
4. Understanding
ethics will help us make better decisions on complex issues.
Many of the questions we face about biodiversity aren’t going to come with
easy answers as to which choice is the best, the most effective, the most
likely to succeed. The more we understand about the ethical roots in our
diverse and increasingly global culture, the more easily we can assess the
complex issues that arise out of the context of our history and our present
environmental crisis. Charting a pathway for biodiversity protection
through multiple value systems, political systems, and the best of what
science can tell us isn’t easy. By increasing our own awareness of the
value systems at play, we can better understand the playing field upon which
biodiversity decisions will be made.
Scratch just about any
biodiversity problem, and under the surface is a collection of ethical
issues waiting to be addressed. We need to be able to identify and talk
about these issues because it will help us find solutions.
back to top
Giving Thanks for Nature's Bounty: Biodiversity-the
Thanksgiving Table
As you sit down for
Thanksgiving, you may see the familiar faces of family and friends.
Chances are, you’ll see some familiar culinary friends too – the
traditional dishes of the American Thanksgiving dinner. But what do
we know about the foods that have come to define Thanksgiving? And
how have these species flourished in the Americas, surviving thousands of
years to provide yet another example of how our history, our culture and
our survival are intimately connected to biodiversity?
 |
At the core
of most Thanksgiving tables, we find the turkey. The wild turkey (Meleagris
gallopavo) is an American native, originally ranging from southern
Canada into Mexico and Guatemala. In the 1500s, Spanish explorers,
having found that wild turkeys were domesticated in Central America,
returned to Europe with this edible bird. Colonists landed in North
America with these turkeys, which eventually crossbred with the wild
turkeys of North America. This fusion has resulted in the variety of
domestic turkeys we find at our tables. |
|
Although wild and domestic turkeys are
genetically the same species, their similarities stop there. The wild
turkey has strong feet and legs adapted for walking and scratching,
and short wings adapted for short, hurried flight. Domesticated
turkeys have strong, modified breast muscles, and do not fly. Wild
turkey plumage exhibits a variety of iridescent colors. Most domestic
turkeys have white plumage, which has proven to attract consumers
because of their “cleaner” appearance. Five subspecies of wild
turkeys inhabit the lower 48 states, including Hawaii, and prefer
woodlands near water. Research has shown that wild turkeys will
consume over 600 species of plants and animals! The domesticated
turkey is no longer able to survive in the wild. |
To obtain Vitamins A and C, we reach for the yams. Or do we? The
true yam, a tuber of West African and Asian origin, is a member of the
genus Dioscorea. The African word “nyami” was adopted in the
English form, yam. The yam is often confused with the sweet potato,
but this is not botanically correct. Originating in Central and South
America, and one of over three hundred food crops cultivated by Native
Americans, the sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, is a member of
the viney morning glory family (Convolvulacaeae). Sweet
potatoes or batatas, which eventually became patata in
Spanish, became known as the potato in English. Because it
thrives in a hot, moist climate, the sweet potato has been grown in
the Southern United States but more so, throughout the tropics.
Cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon), along with the blueberry
and Concord grape, are one of North America’s three native fruits.
Glacial deposits of sand, peat, gravel, and clay in areas from Maine
to Wisconsin, and along the Appalachians to North Carolina, made these
locations ideal for cranberry bogs to flourish. Cranberry bogs
naturally flood in spring to wash away insects, proving that you don’t
need a lot of pesticides to add color and zest to a turkey dinner.
These bogs provide refuge for a variety of wildlife, including Great
Blue Herons, eagles, otters, frogs, and snakes. A cranberry vine, if
left untouched, can continue to produce berries for 150 years!
Colonists in the New World are credited with naming the “craneberry,”
in recognition of the small, pink blossoms that appear in the Spring,
resembling the head and bill of a crane. The flowers fall in the
summer, leaving spectacular red berries. |
Have room for dessert? Indigenous to North America, the pumpkin is
cultivated widely in temperate climates. According to archaeological
records in Mexico (8750 B.C.), the pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo)
appears to be one of the first domesticated plant species. Native
Americans considered pumpkins, planted along with beans and corn, the
“three sisters.” |
 |
|
Bean vines use the cornstalks as
supports and fix nitrogen in the soil. For the benefit of itself and
kin, the large squash leaves shade the soil and retain its moisture.
As the story goes, the origin of pumpkin pie occurred when colonists
sliced off the pumpkin top, removed the seeds, and filled the insides
with milk, spices, and honey and baked it in hot ashes. |
As you make your plans
for Thanksgiving, consider taking steps that will allow these species and
their habitats to flourish thousands of years longer. Pick up your family
and friends and carpool to the celebration, purchase free-range turkeys
and organic, locally grown produce, reuse or recycle any paper, aluminum,
or glass, and compost your vegetable scraps.
If you’re feeling
dizzy, or sleepy, after this bountiful feast, eat some pumpkin seeds.
They’re thought to relieve dizziness. But before nodding off, say
thanks. Thanks to the Earth for Giving.
For more information on
the biodiversity of Thanksgiving, see:
National Wild Turkey
Federation
http://www.apsnet.org/online/feature/cranberry/top.html
Talking Turkeys: They
are not always what we think they are
http://www.uga.edu/srel/ecoview11-14-99.htm
What is the Difference
Between a Sweet Potato and a Yam?
http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/hil/hil-23-a.html
Cranberries: The Most
Intriguing North American Fruit
http://www.apsnet.org/online/feature/cranberry/top.html
Squash
http://www.soupsong.com/fsquash.html
Three Sisters: An
Ancient Garden Trio
http://www.ecoliteracy.org/pages/news_threesisters041901.html
back to
top
|
Biodiversity and Smart Growth Ads- CD Rom Available
|
Are you looking for a fresh way to get
the word out on biodiversity and smart growth? Check out our
attention-getting print ads on biodiversity, sprawl and smart
growth! |
|
|
These ads are a great outreach tool to
promote local issues. You can place them in newspapers, magazines,
your organizational newsletter or Web site, or turn them into
posters or fliers. CDs with
the ads are available free to those who have ordered a copy of our
message kit: Getting on Message: Making the Biodiversity-Sprawl
Connection. A total of nine ads are available from the Project in .pdf
and Quark files. (Both of these formats will allow you to modify
certain aspects of the ads to meet your specific communications
needs.) |
To obtain a CD with the ads in their
editable format (along with guidelines and restrictions for their
use), contact the Biodiversity Project office: project@biodiverse.org
or
Erin Oliver at (608) 250-9876. |
|
back to
top
Cease-fire at
Pinkham Notch:
Defusing the Wise-Use Movement
|
During the
controversy over the fate of the Northern Forest in the 1990s, Bob
Perschel, Director of the Land Ethic Program at The Wilderness Society,
witnessed the power of values-based personal expression and honest
dialogue. He saw first-hand how talking about personal connections to
place, sharing values, and understanding where someone else is coming
from could |

Bob Perschel |
|
transform a confrontation between wilderness advocates and an angry
crowd of property rights activists. |
The following is an excerpt from an interview featured in Ethics for a
Small Planet. Here, Bob recounts how he introduced his personal
values and ethical concerns into a confrontational situation, and the
transformation that resulted from it.
Biodiversity Project:
Bob, tell us a little bit about the situation you were in.
Bob Perschel:
We were holding a
meeting at the Appalachian Mountain Club facility at Pinkham Lodge,
in the middle of the White Mountains in New Hampshire. About twenty or so
property rights people showed up with painted vans and placards. They
marched on the highway and then came inside. The group attacked us for
allegedly trying to ruin their communities and trying to “greenline” the
entire Northern Forest. They became louder and angrier. The conservation
community was in danger of taking a major hit. But there was an opportunity
as well.
Biodiversity Project:
What was that opportunity?
Bob Perschel:
The tactics of the
property rights side presented us with an opportunity to inject something
entirely new and compelling into the mix, enlarge the possibility of
collaboration, and move to a new way of dealing with the issues. They gave
us an opening to talk about values, and by doing so, to recognize each other
as people.
Many of the people who think of themselves as property rights advocates do
so only because this issue was the first thing that came along that appeared
to speak to their core values. But they have other values that can be
awakened, if they can be moved away from their affiliations for a moment.
When that small amount of room is created, it is time to introduce values
that represent the higher aspirations of the human spirit.
Biodiversity Project:
How did you
do this?
Bob Perschel:
I spoke very
slowly in an attempt to demonstrate that I was choosing my words with great
thought and care. I said, “I know that not all of you will agree with what
I have to say, but I want to thank you for listening to me.” Something
changed in the room. We now all had an individual sense of identity, even
though we recognized that we didn’t all agree. From that place it was truly
possible to listen to each other for the first time.
Then I said, “For me to answer your questions, I think it is important that
you understand who I am and what I do.” I told them that I had been a
forester and worked in the woods for many years, and that I believed that we
needed both wilderness and a healthy forest industry.
Then I described how, during my time as a forester, my perception of my
responsibilities changed. I became aware that we might lose 20% of all the
species of life on the planet in the next 30 years. This possibility burned
in my mind. I thought of my legacy to my son and all our legacies to future
generations. What would my son say to me in 30 years? “Dad, what were you
doing? What could you have been thinking?” I told the crowd: “I cannot
accept the possibility of this loss. I cannot allow this to happen, not on
my watch.” I also told them: “I can’t accept that we have to choose between
protecting the environment and protecting jobs. There is a way to do both.”
Biodiversity Project:
How did the
property rights demonstrators react?
Bob Perschel: What
was interesting was that in the end I never had to answer the question
originally put to me about “greenlining.” No one ever asked me about it
when I was done. There was no longer any need to debate this or seek
conflict. Everyone in the room was, at least for a short time, beyond the
conflicts that had so engrossed us.
back to
top
|
|



|